FINAL RULE ON EOBR's ISSUED BY FMCSA

The FMCSA just issued its final rule on Electric On Board Recorders (EOBR's) which replace paper driver logs. Paper logs are often called comic books in the industry because the contents are so funny, because they are so false. A switch to EOBR's will try to eliminate this known problem in the trucking industry. The full text of the rule may be seen here. For known problems with EOBR's click the link to my prior blog here. For past posts regarding EOBR's just past EOBR into the search box and you will have a number of posts on the topic.

The FMCSA has new performance standards for electronic on-board recorders (EOBRs) installed in commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) manufactured on or after June 4, 2012. On-board hours-of-service (HOS) recording devices meeting FMCSA’s current requirements and installed in CMVs manufactured before June 4, 2012 may continue to be used for the remainder of the service life of those CMVs. Motor carriers that have demonstrated serious noncompliance with the HOS rules will be subject to mandatory installation of EOBRs meeting the new performance standards. If FMCSA determines, based on HOS records reviewed during a compliance review, that a motor carrier has a 10 percent or greater violation rate (‘‘threshold rate violation’’) for any HOS regulation listed in the new Appendix C to part 385, FMCSA will issue the carrier an EOBR remedial directive. The motor carrier will then be required to install EOBRs in all of its CMVs regardless of their date of manufacture and use the devices for HOS record keeping for a period of 2 years, unless the carrier (i) already equipped its vehicles with automatic on-board recording devices (AOBRDs) meeting the Agency’s current requirements under 49 CFR 395.15 prior to the finding, and (ii) demonstrates to FMCSA that its drivers understand how to use the devices.

 

The FMCSA also changes the safety fitness standard to take into account a remedial directive when determining fitness. Additionally, to encourage industry-wide use of EOBRs, FMCSA revises its compliance review procedures to permit examination of a random sample of drivers’ records of duty status after the initial sampling, and provides partial relief from HOS supporting documents requirements, if certain conditions are satisfied, for motor carriers that voluntarily use compliant EOBRs. Finally, because FMCSA recognizes that the potential safety risks associated with some motor carrier categories, such as passenger carriers, hazardous materials transporters, and new motor carriers seeking authority to conduct interstate operations in the United States, are such that mandatory EOBR use for such operations might be appropriate, the Agency will initiate a new rulemaking to consider expanding the scope of mandatory EOBR use beyond the ‘‘1 x 10’’ carriers that would be subject to a remedial directive as a result of today’s rule.

 

The Agency is still moving forward with new Hours of Service Rules.

BEFORE YOU HIRE A TRUCK ACCIDENT LAWYER - DID THEY ATTEND THIS PROGRAM?

I wanted to thank all the great speakers on the national trucking program I moderated last Saturday in New Orleans, as well as all the speakers at the private, ITLG members only, program on Friday. We had a great turnout and enjoyed hearing different approaches to problems from around the country. My particular thanks as well to the great staff at AAJ, in particular Molly Laurence and Scott Gehring, and fellow trucking attorney, and the head of the ITLG special project committee, Robert Collins. This is the largest annual national program for lawyers representing those injured in a tractor trailer collision.

Consider what you want for your case. You can certainly hire the faculty to represent you, you can hire someone who attended, or you can hire someone who did not even bother to attend the program. I would suggest, for your case, that you should at least make sure whoever you hire attended the program and is keeping up on the law in this complex and unique area.

The seminar agenda for the Association for Justice's Litigating Trucking Collision Cases was as follows, I have included the lawyers website link for you as well if you want to ask the lawyer for a copy of their paper or reach them directly. Our speakers were: 

 

 Moderator - Morgan Adams

 Documents, Records, and Data—All Kinds of Discovery - Emily Hawk Raley

 Trucking 101: What You Need to Know Before Handling Your First Trucking Case - Michael R. Cowen

 The Records Custodian—The Most Critical Deposition in a Trucking Case - Kenneth L. Shigley

 Interstate Trucking Cases: Equipment, Reconstruction, Evidence Preservation/Spoliation, and Temporary Restraining Orders - Daniel J. Buba

The "Big Ten" COmmercial Transportation "Rules of the Road" - Steven M. Gursten

Comprehensive Safety Analysis 2010: A New Set of Rules for Trucking Companies and Drivers - Lawrence  Simon

 How to Lose a Trucking Case - Allan P. “Chip” Sloan, III  

FMCSR, CDL Manuals, and Negligence Per Se - Matthew A. Cartwright  

The Rogue Trucking Company - Michael J. Leizerman  

Bias and Right Jury Modeling - R. Eddie Davidson

 

MCS-90 Endorsement Acts as Surety Not as Additional Insurance

A recent case will have significant impact on truck accident attorneys and lawyers litigating insurance coverage in trucking cases. In Carolina Casualty v. Yeates, 584 F.3d 868 (10th Cir. 2009) (en banc), the court held that the MCS-90 Endorsement applies as surety coverage when the underlying insurance policy to which it is attached provides no coverage for the loss and the motor carrier’s insurance coverage is not sufficient, IN AGGREGATE, to satisfy the federally prescribed minimum levels of financial responsibility.

As a result of Yeates, Defendant trucking companies and insurers will argue that an insurer’s MCS-90 coverage does not come into play when a plaintiff has already received a payment, from all sources, equal to the minimum statutory insurance coverage amount. See Also: Casper v. American Intl S. Ins. Co., 2009 WL 4984797 (Wis. App.)

 

 The Truck Accident Lawyers at the Law Offices of Morgan Adams concentrate in protecting the rights of those who were seriously injured or lost a loved one in an accident with a commercial truck or bus. Our lawyers are based in Tennessee, but serve clients throughout the nation. If you or someone you love has been seriously hurt by a careless driver, don’t sign anything the trucking company gives you -- contact us as soon as possible at 866-580-4878 or by email to learn more at a free, confidential consultation.

 Morgan Adams is a trial attorney licensed in Tennessee and Georgia. He is listed as a "Mid-South SuperLawyer" (Limited to the top 5% of the lawyers in Tennessee, Mississippi, and Arkansas), is a member of the Million Dollar Advocates Forum (limited to lawyers who have recovered 1 million dollars or more for their clients), and is the Chair of the American Association of Justice's Interstate Trucking Litigation Group. He has served as chair of the Tennessee Association of Justice's Trucking Litigation seminars since 2004, and is a frequent speaker at national legal education programs, training lawyers to properly handle injury cases involving commercial vehicles. 

 

Preventing Tractor Trailer Rollovers

Training remains the number one way to prevent truck rollovers according to government and industry officials. A 2007 report by Battelle Memorial Institute for the FMCSA found “75% [of rollovers] are attributed to driver error.” The primary cause was running off the road, caused by driver fatigue or inattentiveness.”

Trucking companies could reduce rollovers by the following: Lowering a trailer 3” would reduce rollovers approximately 12% annually. A wider trailer track, from 96” to 102”, would reduce rollover’s 17%. The study found the average cost of a rollover was $600,000 and that for every dollar spent on stability control devices the company would save $2.20. According to Steve Niswander, vice president of safety and policy regulatory relations for Groendyke Transport, driver training is still the most effective way to present crashes. (See Transportation Topics, December 10, 2007, p11)