Insurance Companies Trick Victims in Trucking Cases

"I'm here to help." Scary words when said by the government or by an insurance adjuster. I will leave you to your own thoughts about the government's statement, but let me tell you a little about what "I am here to help" means when said by a trucking company executive.

First it means they know you have a serious case, and are desperately trying to avoid paying serious money. Now don't get me wrong, it will seem like a lot of money to you, but the amounts will be far less what your case is really worth. How do insurance companies do this? There are so many underhanded ways that an insurance company can cheat someone out of a fair settlement I could post forever on just that topic.

First, remember the insurance company makes money whenever it pays you less than you deserve.

Some ways that insurance companies cheat you out of money include:

  1. Pretending to be your friend. At a recent trucking seminar several adjusters (the folks who resolve injury and death cases for insurance companies) stated that they would try to become friends with a family by apologizing and offering to buy them a car and a house if they people gave up their claims. They would take this opportunity to demonize lawyers that the family might  hire to represent them. They wanted, at all costs, to prevent the family from talking to an experienced trucking lawyer who would find out how many laws were broken by the trucking company and the driver in causing the wreck. If the real facts of the wreck came to light, showing the company put profits over people, the trucking company would owe many millions of dollars.
  2. The misuse of annuities. Insurance companies will often show that they will pay your family a million dollars over the next thirty years, while failing to mention that the annuity only costs $100,000 today and that your case, today, has a fair value in excess of a million dollars. additionally they will use one of their own corporations to hold the annuity, essentially just switching the money from one hand to another. These captive companies are typically weak financially and are subject to failure over time, leaving you with little or nothing at the end of the day.
  3. They fail to show the impact of inflation on the sums they discuss.
  4. They fail to account for the impact of future medical expenses that wears away at the money paid to the family.
  5. They fail to take into account the full loss of income of the victim. Studies have repeatedly shown that individuals who suffer major injuries can't stay in the workforce as long as those who were never seriously injured, even if back to work at the same job and at the same pay.
  6. They treat the non-economic losses of the family as having no, or minimal, value. The lack of a father or mother growing up in a child's life, or the lack of a child in a parents life, has huge consequences which must be accounted for in a fair valuation of a case.

This is a small sampling of the ways in which insurance companies cheat victims out of proper compensation for the loss and damage suffered at the hands of an unsafe trucking company. Should you ever have specific questions I will be more than happy to answer them.

Morgan Adams is a trial attorney licensed in Tennessee and Georgia. He is listed as a "2008 Mid-South SuperLawyer" (Limited to the top 5% of the lawyers in Tennessee, Mississippi, and Arkansas), is a member of the Million Dollar Advocates Forum (limited to lawyers who have recovered 1 million dollars or more for their clients), and is the Chair-Elect of the American Association of Justice's Interstate Trucking Litigation Group. He has served as chair of the Tennessee Association of Justice's Trucking Litigation seminars since 2004, and is a frequent speaker at national continuing legal education programs on trucking liability cases.

 

See Video's of Common Driver Errors

The FMCSA has posted video's of common driver errors on its web site. See: www.fmcsa.dot.gov/about/outreach/education/driverTips/index.htm

More will be said later about each area, but for now know that the video's show the following: 

Failure to Buckle Up
Too Fast for Conditions
Unfamiliar Roadway
Inadequate Surveillance
Driver Fatigue
Driver Distraction
Following Too Closely
Inadequate Evasive Action

Anti-lock Braking (ABS) in Tractor Trailers

Anti-lock brakes (ABS) were first sold commercially in in 1987 when Freightliner offered a system. The systems were so much better than what was previously available that in 1997 the government required ABS in tractor trailers. Today all air-braked tractors manufactured after March 1, 1997 are required to have ABS, and all trailers and single unit trucks were required to have ABS in 1998.

Generally anti-lock braking systems sense a wheel or axle's rate of deceleration. The wheel speed is sent to the ABS computer which knows how fast a wheel should decelerate without spinning or locking. If the unit determines that the wheel is about to lock up, it can pump the brake. This regains the wheels ability to brake.

This same technology serves as the basis for stability, traction control and anti-roll systems.

Tags:

Cutting Edge Issues in Truck Accident Cases from Las Vegas, New Orleans, and Orlando

I am sorry for being behind on the blog, I was speaking at several seminars, have been actively working with other  trucking lawyers to lobby congress on critical safety regulations (more on this later), and working on my presentations. So where have I been?

I was in New Orleans speaking on "Fatigue in Trucking Cases" at the Southern Trial Lawyers Association, then off to Vegas for the American Association for Justice's Interstate Trucking Litigation Program speaking on "Rollovers" and then, after a few days working on cases, I popped down to Orlando for the Florida Justice Associations Workhorse Seminar and spoke on "Deposing the Safety Director."

While I was gratified by all the kind comments from attendees, more important for my clients was the learning, testing, and discussing of the critical issues in the trucking cases that I have pending. Frankly, any lawyer that does not take advantage of these seminars to discuss with other lawyers, who are experts in the in the field of trucking litigation, the difficult aspects of their clients cases are insane. This gets back to what you look for if you need to hire a trucking lawyer. If your lawyer has not attended at least one trucking specific program every year, for the last five years, you should be looking for another lawyer.

If you thought I was actually going to put all the great ideas I learned from the speakers on the web, for all the defense lawyers to learn and benefit from, I am sorry to disappoint. However I promise to share them with all the defense lawyers when we are in court!